Request which is of non class type

This also occurs if I substitute ". October 19th, , PM 2. Re: "Request for member which is of non-class type Code:. NET Framework. How hard would it really be to port to Windows 8? All times are GMT The time now is PM. Copyright TechnologyAdvice. I was having a similar error, it seems that the compiler misunderstand the call to the constructor without arguments. I made it work by removing the parenthesis from the variable declaration, in your code something like this:.

Turns out the compiler was translating this to. If you want to declare a new substance with no parameter knowing that the object have default parameters don't write. The equivalent error for clang is: error: member reference base type 'float' is not a structure or union.

Turns out the compiler was confusing local variable name 'data' and my member variable data. Question I have a class with two constructors, one that takes no arguments and one that takes one argument. Foo foo1 1 ; foo1. That should be OK for me. I will add those constants in the main file. Apologies again if I have wasted your time. I always try to make sure the questions are asked in a way that it is easier for others to follow, but finally mess up.

Thanks for the tip. I have added the below code as a separate function and calling M0. Another tip would be not to use the define directive for simple literals. You can debug easier if you use:. Apart from easy debugging, is there any additional advantage like quicker processing, or lesser memory usage? There are a bunch, but you may read some pros and cons here Most of the advantages will come later if you are new to this so it is good to start off on the right foot.

You can tell by usage like this or typedef keyword as another example that there are a bunch of people on the forum that grew up with plain C, so you see a lot of that paradigm here. Anyway, the answers are yes and no. But, the additional time that the preprocessor takes to perform name resolution is negligible. You CAN put code, preprocessor directives, etc. After all, that's what you do when you put the class definition in a.

If you post the real code, with the separate header file for the declarations, it is quite possible that we can explain why what you have done is wrong, why, and how to fix it. I have put it in a separate header file and calling it in the main function.

It works.